Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF OKLAHOMA, by and through its Judges" Results 1 - 20 of 486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Oklahoma Supreme Court reversed Tuesday a $465 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson (J&J) for public nuisance through its prescription opioid marketing campaign in the state. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 am by ALeonard
Cait O’Darling appealed the dismissal to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which ruled on July 1, 2008, in O’Darling v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:38 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The Supreme Court Blocks Enforcement of the Trial Judge’s Ruling On appeal, the state supreme court ruled that the trial judge committed an error when he issued the disputed order, and it blocked its enforcement. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One of this series, we began discussing a lawsuit filed by Oklahoma attorney Stephen Jones in the Oklahoma Supreme Court seeking to prevent the state from holding a special election this year to replace U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 7:53 am by Kyle Persaud
After judgment is entered After judgment is entered, the losing party may appeal the case to the Oklahoma Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:29 pm by Andrew Hamm
Today, I am nominating Chief Judge Merrick Brian Garland to join the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:47 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Oklahoma, the Supreme Court held that indigent criminal defendants have a constitutional right of access to a psychiatric expert in some cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:47 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Oklahoma, the Supreme Court held that indigent criminal defendants have a constitutional right of access to a psychiatric expert in some cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:47 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Oklahoma, the Supreme Court held that indigent criminal defendants have a constitutional right of access to a psychiatric expert in some cases. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The ruling (found here) is the third by a state judge in Florida; the issue is now moving through appeals, so the Fort Lauderdale judge put the new ruling on hold. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:34 pm by Womenstake blog
The court also interpreted a Supreme Court decision in 2002 narrowing the right to sue under federal law to support its decision that, even if the state were in violation of its obligation to make proper payments, individuals do not have the right to challenge that violation. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:56 am by Steven V. Buckman
The Oklahoma Supreme Court (and all of the appellate judges in the various divisions) work extremely h [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 10:43 am by FHH Law
But it does underscore a continuing theme running through the extended Aereo/FilmOn X litigation: in reaching its conclusion that Aereo is not likely to succeed on the merits, the three-judge Tenth Circuit panel split 2-1. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:22 pm
The Supreme Court explained (without dissent) that “courts of equity in this state are without authority to review decisions of football referees because those decisions do not present judicial controversies. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
In addition, Oklahoma remains free to interpret our own state constitution, with its own protection against "unreasonable searches or seizures," more broadly than the United States Supreme Court interprets the federal constitution. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Judge McHugh, who wrote a concurrence in the appeals court, correctly determined that there should be no constitutional difference between compelled speech through words and compelled speech through images. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
On Friday, June 22, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]